Maybe in USA, such "overinformation" is needed, I don't know, Is there any known legal case, that was won or lost because of EULA or missing EULA ? But interesting, for sure!īut to be honest, I don't know if this makes any legal difference, if we have it or not. I was tempted to create 1 page setup, only having the real necessary information, but squeezing in the EULA window is a little tricky. Not all users always install all update versions throughout the year, so having welcome page to show the exact version they are installing is quite welcome.Īnd I have 'run project' checkbox at the end, default non-checked. In my case my projects are usually installed couple of times a year. I really don't like notepad++ or filezilla cumbersome update every couple of weeks. You are right in a way! I think there is a difference between download and install (which happens less often) vs 'check for updates' and install (which can happen weekly or bi-weekly for a lot of software). Same like "Setup has now finished" you sometimes see.īy the way: Compare with this totally stripped down MSIX install experience on Windows: The welcome page they use for their example makes no sense, because it provides absolutely no information. It's not like you have to introduce your program, the user has already decided to install. I don't have installers, but I think there's nothing wrong with that.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |